• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

Washington Post Editorial on UN and harm reduction

The Bush administration is quietly extending a policy that undermines the global battle against AIDS. "The State Department's new leadership needs to end this bullying flat-earthism. It won't help President Bush's current effort to relaunch his image among allies. And it's almost certain to kill people."

Deadly Ignorance
Editorial
The Washington Post, 27 February 2005

The Bush administration is quietly extending a policy that undermines the global battle against AIDS. It is being pushed in this direction by Congress, notably by Rep. Mark Edward Souder (R-Ind.). But some administration officials zealously defend this policy error, claiming scientific evidence that doesn't exist.

The administration's error is to oppose the distribution of uncontaminated needles to drug addicts. A large body of scientific evidence suggests that the free provision of clean needles curbs the spread of AIDS among drug users without increasing rates of addiction. Given that addicts are at the center of many of the AIDS epidemics in Eastern Europe and Asia, ignoring this science could cost millions of lives. In Russia, as of 2004, 80 percent of all HIV cases involved drug injectors, and many of these infections occurred because addicts share contaminated needles. In Malaysia, China, Vietnam and Ukraine, drug injectors also account for more than half of all HIV cases. Once a critical mass of drug users carries the virus, the epidemic spreads via unprotected sex to non-drug users.

The administration claims that the evidence for the effectiveness of needle exchange is shaky. An official who requested anonymity directed us to a number of researchers who have allegedly cast doubt on the pro-exchange consensus. One of them is Steffanie A. Strathdee of the University of California at San Diego; when we contacted her, she responded that her research "supports the expansion of needle exchange programs, not the opposite." Another researcher cited by the administration is Martin T. Schechter of the University of British Columbia; he wrote us that "Our research here in Vancouver has been repeatedly used to cast doubt on needle exchange programs. I believe this is a clear misinterpretation of the facts." Yet a third researcher cited by the administration is Julie Bruneau at the University of Montreal; she told us that "in the vast majority of cases needle exchange programs drive HIV incidence lower." We asked Dr. Bruneau whether she favored needle exchanges in countries such as Russia or Thailand. "Yes, sure," she responded.

The Bush administration attempted to bolster its case by providing us with three scientific articles. One, which has yet to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, was produced by an author unknown to leading experts in this field who is affiliated with a group called the Children's AIDS Fund. This group is more renowned for its ties to the Bush administration than for its public health rigor: As the Post's David Brown has reported, it recently received an administration grant despite the fact that an expert panel had deemed its application "not suitable for funding." The two other articles supplied by the administration had been published in the American Journal of Public Health. Although each raised questions about the certainty with which needle-exchange advocates state their case, neither opposed such programs.

Evidence that the administration does not cite leaves little doubt about the case for needle exchange. A study of 81 cities published in 1997 in the Lancet, a medical journal, found that in cities without needle-exchange programs, HIV infection rates among injection drug users rose by nearly 6 percent per year; by contrast, cities that had introduced free-needle programs witnessed a decrease in infection rates of about the same magnitude. Elias A. Zerhouni, the director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote last year that exchange programs "can be an effective component of a comprehensive community-based HIV prevention effort," and a World Health Organization technical paper agreed that the provision of clean needles and syringes should be "a fundamental component of any comprehensive and effective HIV-prevention programme." Addressing legitimate methodological questions about the research favoring needle exchange, the WHO reasonably concluded that incomplete scient ific evidence does not confer the freedom to ignore the knowledge we do have.

Respecting science does not appear to be the administration's priority, however. Not only is it refusing to spend federal dollars on needle exchange, but the administration also is waging a campaign to persuade the United Nations to toe its misguided line. The U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, which is heavily reliant on U.S. funding, has been made to expunge references to needle exchange from its literature, and the administration is expected to continue its pressure on the United Nations at a meeting that starts March 7. The State Department's new leadership needs to end this bullying flat-earthism. It won't help President Bush's current effort to relaunch his image among allies. And it's almost certain to kill people.

Copyright 2005 The Washington Post

 
  • Labels
    2005 CND debate | HIV/AIDS | CND | harm reduction

Drugs in the News

  • Senate Democrats roll out long-awaited bill to legalize marijuana
    21.07.2022
  • Council of State opposes plan to ban sale of laughing gas
    18.07.2022
  • Brussels Mayor: ‘Police repression does not work, decriminalise cannabis now’
    18.07.2022
  • Luxembourg leads the charge for a new European drug policy
    17.07.2022
  • Results of cultivated cannabis experiment won't be ready in 2024: Ministers
    08.07.2022
  • Hundreds of thousands of Canadians could see their drug possession records disappear
    04.07.2022
More news

Weblog

    Statement on the UN Common Position and Task TeamStatement on the UN Common Position and Task Team
    15.04.2021
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 hide
africa  11 albania  13 alternative development  118 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  84 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  98 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  45 barbados  11 belgium  37 belize  10 bermuda  12 bolivia  115 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  44 california  209 cambodia  12 canada  522 cannabinoids  95 cannabis  3023 cannabis clubs  198 cannabis industry  393 caribbean  146 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  129 coca  214 cocaine  71 coffee shop  220 cognitive decline  30 colombia  150 colorado  161 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  255 corporate capture  49 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  78 czech republic  31 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  889 deforestation  8 denmark  122 drug checking  40 drug consumption rooms  191 drug courts  22 drug markets  140 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  52 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  65 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  21 eradication  127 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  7 european drug policy  83 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  15 fentanyl  79 france  111 fumigation  25 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  176 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  338 hemp  40 heroin  134 heroin assisted treatment  79 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  101 honduras  3 human rights  253 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  52 INCB  138 india  94 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  14 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  170 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  31 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  407 lebanon  43 legal highs  63 legalization  1539 lesotho  9 local customization  8 luxembourg  45 malaysia  7 malta  37 medical cannabis  640 mental health  44 methamphetamine  46 mexico  209 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  41 money laundering  54 morocco  119 naloxone  15 nepal  7 netherlands  312 new york  28 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  7 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  126 opioids  147 opium  93 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  23 peru  42 peyote  3 philippines  89 pleasure  5 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  6 prevention  3 prison situation  100 producers  140 prohibition  144 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  53 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  117 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1292 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  30 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  141 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  66 singapore  6 social justice  74 south africa  73 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  31 sweden  28 switzerland  144 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  48 teen use  43 thailand  64 thresholds  54 tobacco industry  17 tramadol  17 treatment  27 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  270 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  429 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  144 US drug policy  1165 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  131 WHO  62 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf