• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

SCOPE: Strategy for Coca and Opium Poppy Elimination

UNDCPs 1998 plan to eradicate the cultivation of both coca and opium poppy by the year 2008 was a rare opportunity to re-think current drugs efforts. Member states were asked to endorse a plan, known as SCOPE, for the eradication of drugs-linked crops by 2008, and have it presented at the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) in June 1998 in New York. Is SCOPE viable? And what impact would it have on poor farmers who grow drugs-linked crops to survive?

The 'Global Plan for the Elimination of Illicit Narcotic Crops'

The 'Global Plan' (An International Strategy to Eliminate the Illicit Cultivation of Coca Bush and Opium Poppy – SCOPE), aims at the worldwide elimination of illicit coca bush and opium poppy within 10 years (in 2008 that is), as a first and decisive step to rid the world of its drug problem. With the announcement of a final date the UNDCP seeks a political and financial commitment of the international community. In an interview with the Italian daily La Repubblica, the executive director of the UNDCP, the Italian Pino Arlacchi, said the plan would cost US$ five billion, and has to be financed by the UN member states. Alledgedly the plan has met considerable scepticism. It is considered very "ambitious", but its attainability is widely questioned.

Interesting to note is that the initial outline of the plan (see: document E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11) does not mention a fixed 10-year period. The only document mentioning a 10-year period is the draft proposal of the United States on 'Eradication of Illicit Narcotic Crops and Promotion of Alternative Development Prorammes' for the declaration at UNGASS (see: document E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9). Point 3 of the US proposal says: "States should commit to ending all illicit cultivation of opium poppy and coca bush by the year 2008, using all available means, including alternative development, eradication and law enforcement".

Attempts for approval at the 1998 UNGASS

The UNDCP had hoped for approval of the strategy at the preparatory commission (PrepCom) meetings before UNGASS, but didn't altogether succeed. Arlacchi asked the member states to recommend that the General Assembly at its special session endorse the initiative of the UNDCP to develop and implement SCOPE. His strategy was to have a reference to the plan in either the Action Plan on International Cooperation on the Eradication of Illicit Drug Crops and Alternative Development, or the Political Declaration. A summary was presented to the member states during the PrepCom in December 1997.

Initially, this went terribly wrong. Delegations felt overwhelmed by the plan they had received at a late stage, and word in the lobby was that Arlacchi was firmly opposed in some quarters. SCOPE was removed from the proposed draft Action Plan. During a plenary session on the draft Political Declaration -which also mentioned the 2008 elimination target date- the Dutch delegation diplomatically called for 'feasible goals' both 'in substance and target dates' and added that 'quantative benchmarks should not be an end in itself', which in diplomatic terms could be conceived as a strong critique on the plan.

It became clear that SCOPE would not be discussed by the PrepCom in Vienna. Most European and Latin American countries thought SCOPE was not sufficiently worked out, especially on the subjects of how to finance the proposal, monitoring and the collaboration with other UN organisations. Endorsement there end then would mean issuing a blanc cheque, they felt.

But the UNDCP lobbied successfully in the decisive hours of PrepCom trying to keep the plan on the agenda of the Special Session in New York. Arlacchi called for a press conference on the last day of the meeting. He declared that the outcome of the deliberations during the week on the several draft action plans was a basic endorsement of the proposals of SCOPE, though the details were not discussed. In the end, the final draft of the Political Declaration -only approved on an additional Saturday due to serious disagreements on the final text- calls to "strongly support" the work of the UNDCP in the field of alternative development, and to "emphasize the need for eradication programmes and law enforcement measures to counter illicit cultivation". Moreover, the declaration "welcomes" the UNDCP's global approach to the elimination of illicit crops and "commits" member states to work closely with the UNDCP "to develop strategies with a view to eliminate or significantly reduce the illicit cultivation of the coca bush, the cannabis plant and the opium poppy by 2008." 

The cannabis plant was included at the request of Nigeria – where there is no coca nor opium cultivation. Nigeria considers cannabis to be an "extremely dangerous drug", and felt left out as far as funds for alternative development were concerned, noted Western observers. At the suggestion of the Latin American group of member states (GRULAC) "eradication of opium poppy and coca bush" was changed to "eliminate or significantly reduce". But in the end, without actually mentioning SCOPE itself, the general idea of the strategy is practically endorsed. An earlier version of the draft Political Declaration did not even include such strong commendation of the UNDCP "global approach". Arlacchi may not have gotten SCOPE itself into any declaration, but he got his go-ahead.

A closer look at SCOPE

SCOPE's main objective is worldwide elimination of the illicit cultivation of coca bush and opium poppy by the year 2008. The strategy calls for a 'balanced approach' between law enforcement, alternative development and demand reduction, to rid the world of 'the scourge of heroin and cocaine'. Alternative development is intended to receive the bulk of the approximately US$ 4 billion budget: 74%. Law enforcement is allotted 20% and demand reduction 2%. The UNDCP itself doesn't have innate funds, so it has appealed to the international community to commit itself to SCOPE and to provide the necessary funding. (6)

The plan focuses on eight key countries in three regions: Bolivia, Colombia and Peru in Latin America; the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Myanmar (or Burma as the suppressed democratic opposition prefers to call their nation) and Vietnam in South-East Asia; and Afghanistan and Pakistan in South-West Asia. The supply of illicit opiates and coca derivatives today originates in these "limited number of well-defined geographical areas", according to the UNDCP in summing up the favorable factors in eliminating opiates and coca derivatives in their analysis of the situation.

Secondly, says the agency, "after three decades of experience, the international community is now equipped with tested methodologies and the know-how to tackle the problem in the producing areas. The strengthening of the drug control mechanisms in the regions concerned has paved the way for full-scale interventions and most producing countries have adopted well-defined national strategies and action plans that are ready for implementation."

"At the same time," continues the plan's summary, "it is possible to monitor the areas at risk in order to prevent the 'balloon effect' from nullifying the overall impact of elimination programmes." The 'balloon effect' is the movement of cultivation to previously untouched area as a result of increased enforcement in an area of cultivation (when you squeeze one part of a balloon, the air simply moves to another part without reducing the total amount of air).

The last favorable factor is that "there is no alternative to concerted and comprehensive action". The expression of a "clear political will and the adoption of a common agenda on the part of the international community" is therefore required. The Special Session of the General Assembly on Drug Control "offers an historic opportunity for all positive forces to converge", according to the UNDCP.

A closer look at the confidential 170-page draft of SCOPE reveals the flaws in the strategy, which are less obvious in the summary presented to the PrepCom session. The plan mentions three ideal conditions for alternative development: (1) Effective control of the area by central government and an absence of counterpressure from insurgent groups; (2) The provision of an enabling economic environment at the national and international level which facilitates the presence of market forces that make illicit cultivation less attractive; (3) Consistently applied disincentives through law enforcement and eradication.

A large part of the strategy is centred around elimination and countering the 'balloon effect' in an almost military fashion: development of satellite reconnaissance, rapid assessment teams (RATs) to monitor displacement of drug crops, and the research and development of biological and chemical weapons for "environmentally safe" eradication. The more general, if tacit thinking behind SCOPE is that since drug crop cultivation has been reduced to a well-defined 'pocket' of production areas in the eight above mentioned countries, the containment of this pocket and a last massive final offensive can eliminate the problem once and for all.

Disqueting elements

The 'Global Plan' has some disquieting elements. For instance, it proposes to blend alternative development (crop substitution) with law enforcement measures to eliminate illicit narcotic crop cultivation "to provide a credible deterrent". A combination which has not worked in the past and caused considerable resistance with small-scale producers. These peasants largely depend on the cultivation of drug crops to merely survive. Exactly because it proved to be counter-productive several governments tend to separate law enforcement requirements from alternative development. The UNDCP says to have build the plan on "the experience gained and the lessons learned", but seems to be very slow of understanding.

"Safe" Methods of Eradication

Allarming is the advocacy of chemical fumigation with herbicides and biological control with microbial herbicides as a method to erradicate narcotic crops, proposed by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (see: document E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8: 'International Cooperation on Eradication of Illicit Drug Crops and Promotion of Alternative Development Programmes and Projects', section: 'Finding Safe Methods of Eradication'). The aerial spraying of herbicides has become a widespread counter-narcotics effort during the last years (even though "safe" herbicides apparently are not yet available). Advocated by the United States, Latin-American governments (Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Guatemala, and Venezuela) increasingly tend to consider chemical fumigation as an effective measure to fight the spread of illicit crops, despite the obvious negative social, environmental and health consequences.

It is highly questionable that there ever will be "safe" herbicides, and there is grave concern about the long-term effects of the massive spreading of these chemicals in the vulnerable ecosystem of the Colombian Amazon tropical rainforest, where coca cultivation is concentrated. The Guaviare and other coca growing regions of Colombia were the scene of widespread social protest in July, August and September of 1996, when an estimated 241,000 people participated in massive marches - one of the largest peasant mobilizations in Colombian history - to protest aerial eradication, lack of government support for economic development and the increasing presence of the Colombian military. In the violence that ensued, 12 individuals were victims of extrajudicial executions and seven disappeared. A number of protest leaders subsequently received death threats and seven were killed, apparently for their involvement in the protest (see: Coca Eradication Efforts in Colombia, WOLA, June 1997).

The Colombian government sprayed 48.000 hectares of coca and poppy crop in 1997. Nevertheless the the total area with drug-crop cultivation expanded with 10 percent, according to satellite monitoring. The fields were simply moved to other areas. One can imagine what will happen next: these fields will be sprayed the next year; cultivation (which in itself is not particulary friendly to the ecosystem) will again move to other regions. A "vicious" circle, contaminating ever-increasing areas.

SCOPE exit?

The controversial strategy was carefully avoided during the UN General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS 1998). It was clear beforehand that the reluctance of potential SCOPE-donor countries during the last PrepCom had already prevented that SCOPE as such was part of the official UNGASS agenda, but it was even further off than expected. From UNDCP side the very word 'SCOPE' wasn't even mentioned. The UNDCP consciously decided to avoid further contamination of UNGASS by the controverses that arose in reaction to the SCOPE-plan.

Of course, in many ways, references were made to the 'need for a global strategy' and the 'viability of achieving a significant reduction of illicit crop production by 2008'. Similar wordings remained in the adopted Political Declaration, which expresses support for UNDCP to architect and direct such a strategy, giving executive director Pino Arlacchi the much wanted mandate to continue along the SCOPE-path.

But it was quite apparent UNDCP had felt the necessity to ajust their tactics and soften their language. Just three months ago Arlacchi, defending SCOPE, could be quoted saying "The 'war on drugs' has not been fought and lost; it has never started." Now in New York he stated, very carefully, "There has never been a war on drugs – and there should not be one now. I think we all agree – the drug problem is more like a disease. And together we have to cure the patient, hit at the traffickers and criminal groups, and provide an alternate way of life to those engaged in illicit cultivation."

The paper Caught in the Crossfire - Developing Countries, the UNDCP and the War on Drugs, jointly published by The Transnational Institute and the Catholic Institute of International Relations (CIIR), clearly made an impact. It was the only available serious critique on one of the most controversial issues in the background of this UNGASS. Next to the reluctance of several delegations, it's fair to say that our campaign around it did at least contribute to the softening of language from UNDCP side and their very careful handling of the SCOPE-issue at press conferences.

Related documents:

  • An International Strategy to Eliminate the Illicit Cultivation of Coca Bush and Opium Poppy, E/CN.7/1998/PC/CRP.4, document presented at the CND, Vienna, March 16-20, 1998
  • A Global Plan for the Elimination of Illicit Narcotic Crops, E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11, December 1, 1997
  • Draft Proposal by the European Union, E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.10, December 1, 1997
  • Draft Proposal by the United States, E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9, November 27, 1997
  • Proposal by Colombia, E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.7/Rev.1, November 27, 1997
  • Note by the Secretariat of the CND, E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8, October 23, 1997

For a critical assessment of SCOPE read:

  • Lessons to Learn by Ken Bluestone & Tom Blickman, The World Today, Vol. 54, No. 6, June 1998
  • Caught in the Crossfire. Developing Countries, the UNDCP, and the War on Drugs by Tom Blickman. A joint briefing of TNI and the Catholic Institute for International Relations (CIIR), June 1998
  • Labels
    fumigation | 1998 UNGASS | civil society | eradication | opium | CND | UNGASS | alternative development | coca

Drugs in the News

  • The Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill: pretty good so far
    04.12.2019
  • Drug Foundation praises the proposed cannabis law – but National says it's not up to scratch
    03.12.2019
  • Personal drug use and possession should be decriminalised, former Supreme Court justice argues
    02.12.2019
  • ‘B.C. bud’ cannabis still underground, John Horgan hopes to rescue it
    02.12.2019
  • Consider decriminalisation to tackle drug death ‘crisis’, say treatment providers in unprecedented plea
    01.12.2019
  • Medical grade heroin drug treatment centre to open in Glasgow
    26.11.2019
More news

Weblog

    Growers' voices at the Commission on Narcotic DrugsGrowers' voices at the Commission on Narcotic Drugs
    25.11.2019
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  1 afghanistan  23 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  1 afghanistan  23 hide
albania  6 alternative development  102 amnesty  44 argentina  31 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  85 ayahuasca  5 ballot 2012  155 banking  39 barbados  6 belgium  28 belize  10 bolivia  111 brazil  81 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  40 california  188 cambodia  9 canada  432 cannabinoids  70 cannabis  2480 cannabis clubs  177 cannabis industry  305 caribbean  109 caricom  32 central america  5 chile  21 china  41 civil society  35 CND  121 coca  199 cocaine  44 coffee shop  196 cognitive decline  27 colombia  136 colorado  156 compulsary detention  18 conflict  3 conventions  242 costa rica  9 crack  48 craft cannabis  23 crime  45 czech republic  29 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  755 deforestation  8 denmark  114 drug checking  31 drug consumption rooms  153 drug courts  21 drug markets  110 drug testing  7 drug trade  24 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  55 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 eradication  115 essential medicines  25 european drug policy  56 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  82 fair trade  11 fentanyl  63 france  92 fumigation  19 gateway theory  29 germany  141 ghana  12 global commission  46 greece  18 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  312 hemp  22 heroin  114 heroin assisted treatment  73 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  59 honduras  2 human rights  235 incarceration  50 INCB  131 india  81 indonesia  27 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  13 iran  14 ireland  14 israel  48 italy  31 jamaica  149 japan  2 kava  2 ketamine  27 khat  35 kratom  25 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  340 lebanon  29 legal highs  63 legalization  1188 lesotho  4 luxembourg  22 malaysia  6 malta  10 medical cannabis  531 mental health  33 methamphetamine  32 mexico  186 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  37 money laundering  49 morocco  75 naloxone  9 nepal  2 netherlands  265 new zealand  46 NIDA  5 norway  14 NPS  5 opinion polls  98 opioids  106 opium  86 oregon  27 overdose kits  3 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  16 peace  17 peru  38 philippines  79 pleasure  5 police pacification  18 portugal  62 potency  2 precursors  3 prevention  3 prison situation  90 producers  90 prohibition  131 proportionality  110 psychedelics  4 psychosis  51 puerto rico  2 reclassification  112 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1089 russia  34 safe supply  3 safer crack  28 scheduling  15 scientific research  122 sdg  2 security  13 sentencing  63 singapore  5 social justice  21 south africa  45 spain  74 st lucia  5 st vincent and grenadines  28 substance-use disorder  16 substitution treatment  29 sweden  26 switzerland  121 synthetic cannabinoids  29 taxation  28 thailand  47 thresholds  26 tramadol  16 treatment  17 trinidad & tobago  9 tunisia  4 UK  224 UN drug control  406 UNGASS  58 UNODC  105 uruguay  143 US drug policy  1035 vaping  1 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  129 WHO  49 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf