• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

Draft Proposal United States

Draft Proposal by the United States, 27 November 1997 

FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY
E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9
27 November 1997
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS ACTING AS PREPARATORY BODY FOR THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEVOTED TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ILLICIT PRODUCTION, SALE, DEMAND, TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES

Third informal open-ended inter-sessional meeting
Vienna, 5 December 1997
Item 2 of the provisional agenda*

ERADICATION OF ILLICIT NARCOTIC CROPS AND PROMOTION OF
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

Draft non-paper to be included in the declaration on implementing the 1988 United Nations Convention against-Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotic Substances

PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED STATES**

*E/CN.711997/PC/8.
**This document has not been edited.
V.97-28603


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9

Page 2

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON ERADICATION OF ILLICIT DRUG CROPS AND PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

Problem

Despite the adoption of international conventions promoting the prohibition of illicit drug crops the problem of cultivation of coca bush, opium poppy, and cannabis plant continues at alarming levels.

Action

1. States and their community leaders must strongly condemn the cultivation of coca bush, opium poppy, and cannabis plants as well as other illicit drug crops.

2. States and their community leaders should ensure that the specific commitments of

the United Nations conventions regarding illicit drug crop cultivation are implemented and enforced,

including:

the provisions of the 1961 Convention (and its 1972 Protocol) which calls upon member States to prohibit the cultivation of opium poppy, the coca bush, or the cannabis plant to protect the public health and welfare and prevent diversion into illicit traffic and to take measures to seize any plants illicitly cultivated;

the provision of the 1988 Convention which calls upon parties to adopt measures to establish as a criminal offense the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush, or cannabis plant for the production of narcotic drugs contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention and that Convention as amended and to take appropriate measures to prevent illicit cultivation of and to eradicate plants containing narcotic or psychotropic substances.

3. States should commit to ending all illicit cultivation of opium poppy and coca bush by the year 2008, using all available means, including alternative development, eradication and law enforcement.

4. States with illicit drug cultivation should develop national strategies to implement the provisions of the 1961 Convention and article 14 of the 1988 Convention regarding the elimination of drug crops.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP. 9

Page 3

Problem

History has shown that there is no single response to eliminating the cultivation and production of illicit drugs.

Action

5. National crop elimination strategies and programmes should include comprehensive measures such as programmes in alternative development, law enforcement and eradication.

6. National crop elimination strategies should include concrete measurable objectives.

Problem

Member States have often undertaken valiant efforts to eliminate the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush, and cannabis plant. Nevertheless, in many cases, successes in eliminating illicit drug cultivation in one area have resulted in increased illicit cultivation of such crops in other regions or countries.

Action

7. States should cooperate through bilateral, regional and multilateral means to prevent drug organizations from moving cultivation from one area, region, or country to another.

8. States should share information on illicit drug crop assessments with UNDCP and other Governments in order to increase cooperation to eliminate such cultivation

Problem

Alternative development is an important component for generating and promoting lawful, viable, and sustainable economic options to illicit drug crop cultivation. Against this backdrop, countries with illicit drug crops will need to seek continued assistance to support national efforts to eliminate drug crops.

Action

9. Member States with illicit drug., crop cultivation should present national plans to potential donors, including from bilateral and multilateral donors such as the World Bank and relevant regional banks, and request assistance to support their efforts to eliminate drug crops.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CP,P.9

Page 4

10. Donor nations and the relevant United Nations organizations should assist countries in countering illicit drug production by providing alternative development assistance with the objective of eliminating drug crops.

11. The international financial institutions and the regional development banks should provide loans and other assistance for alternative development programmes that have as their objective the elimination of drug crops.

Problem

Alternative development programmes are not necessarily interchangeable from country to country.

Action

12. National authorities and local communities should be involved when development and implementing alternative development projects.

13. Local economic, social and cultural characteristics of the communities receiving alternative development assistance should be taken into account when alternative development programmes are developed.

14. Alternative development programmes should, when possible and necessary, include:

  • sustainable development criteria;
  • market projects which rehabilitate existing agricultural economy, integrate pest management, and technology transfer;
  • institutional development support;
  • market opportunities for new licit crops by linking new legitimate producers with potential markets;
  • development of infrastructure such as roads and irrigation systems to encourage the abandonment of illicit crops;
  • employment opportunities in the non-agricultural sector, where economically viable;
  • close collaboration among, private investment, the inclusion of civil society, and non-governmental organizations.

E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9

Page 5

15. UNDCP should promote efforts by the World Bank and regional banks to convene a series of regional donor conferences to seek resources for alterative development programmes in support of comprehensive crop control strategies.

16. Those countries that have experienced success in eliminating drug crops should share their experiences through UNDCP.

Problem

Even when development projects are successful, drug traffickers still have the resources to achieve many of their objectives. Large numbers of growers and processors are not likely to abandon the trade voluntarily simply because other opportunities exists; they must see that there is a risk associated with staying in illicit drug cultivation.

Action

17. Member States with illicit drug crop cultivation problems should ensure that sustainable development initiatives are backed, when necessary, by credible enforcement measures,

18. Comprehensive drug interdiction programmes can have disruptive efforts on the market that help drive down the price of illicitly cultivated drug crops and in so doing make alternative sources of legal income more competitive and attractive.

19. Under other circumstances, or when other strategies have not worked, States should consider deterrence measures such as eradication, destruction of illicit drug crops, arrests, as called for in the 1961 and 1988 Conventions.

20. Eradication efforts should utilize available research and ensure that environmentally safe methods are employed.


Drugs in the News

  • Cannabis cafés and self-growing: Czechia presents draft of new marijuana law
    11.01.2024
  • Minister signs bill banning recreational use of weed
    08.01.2024
  • As the mayor of Amsterdam, I can see the Netherlands risks becoming a narco-state
    05.01.2024
  • Barcelona city council threatens to shut down cannabis social clubs
    04.01.2024
  • Swiss capital Bern considers legal cocaine project
    20.12.2023
  • High time: after five years, Dutch start legal cannabis trial
    15.12.2023
More news

Weblog

    Willful blindness: INCB can find nothing good to say on cannabis legalisation
    14.03.2023
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  38 afghanistan  25 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  38 afghanistan  25 hide
africa  14 albania  14 alternative development  120 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  89 amphetamine  1 amsterdam  30 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  109 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  52 barbados  11 belgium  46 belize  10 bermuda  15 bhang  15 bolivia  118 brazil  95 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  45 california  216 cambodia  12 canada  543 cannabinoids  107 cannabis  3255 cannabis clubs  230 cannabis industry  417 caribbean  148 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  131 coca  220 cocaine  95 coffee shop  230 cognitive decline  30 colombia  160 colorado  163 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  277 corporate capture  59 corruption  5 costa rica  10 crack  55 craft cannabis  31 crime  92 czech republic  54 dark net  4 death penalty  3 decertification  1 decriminalization  935 deforestation  11 denmark  132 drug checking  41 drug consumption rooms  193 drug courts  22 drug markets  147 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  60 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  70 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  38 eradication  129 essential medicines  25 estonia  2 eswatini  7 ethiopia  3 european drug policy  119 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  16 fentanyl  84 france  119 fumigation  27 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  217 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  32 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  348 hemp  44 heroin  139 heroin assisted treatment  80 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  124 honduras  4 human rights  259 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  53 INCB  143 india  102 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  17 iran  14 ireland  16 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  176 japan  3 kava  4 kazakhstan  5 kenya  11 ketamine  27 khat  37 kratom  33 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  432 lebanon  43 legal highs  64 legalization  1709 lesotho  10 local customization  11 luxembourg  60 malawi  4 malaysia  7 malta  58 medical cannabis  665 mental health  45 methamphetamine  49 mexico  211 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  46 money laundering  55 morocco  128 naloxone  16 nepal  7 netherlands  341 new york  34 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nigeria  1 nitrous oxide  9 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  132 opioids  153 opium  94 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  24 peru  45 peyote  3 philippines  89 pilot project  137 pleasure  5 poland  2 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  7 prevention  3 prison situation  101 prohibition  158 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  57 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  119 recriminalisation  42 regulation  1454 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  36 safer crack  29 scheduling  29 scientific research  145 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  67 singapore  7 social justice  83 somalia  7 south africa  83 spain  81 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  20 substitution treatment  31 sweden  31 switzerland  162 synthetic cannabinoids  31 taxation  58 teen use  43 thailand  78 thresholds  64 tobacco industry  17 traditional growers  162 tramadol  17 treatment  29 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  282 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  444 UNGASS  58 UNODC  111 uruguay  146 US drug policy  1192 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  134 WHO  66 world drug report  11 yemen  6

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2024 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf